We launched the new calculator updates. These allow you to mix recipes with flavor shots and premixes, as well as mix a premix from just a formulation.

We also had some bug fixes in the update. There was previously an issue where mix counts weren't incrementing, so that was fixed. We fixed a bug that would cause issues if a recipe had more than 20 revisions (due to a self-imposed query limiter). We also fixed a state bug when adding favorites or flash stashing flavors from a recipe view.

Next

I am currently working on enhancements for Batches. There will be a general Browse Batches menu item and page. Recipes are getting featured or pinned batches, so the recipe author can highlight a mix or variant of the recipe. Recipes will also be getting a public batches list. These will all be under a selector button, so you can choose which batch view is being shown, instead of adding more buttons or tabs.

We will also be adding the ability to set ingredients to 1/1000 instead of just 1/100 as well as the ability to mix by parts, instead of percent.

We have some new types of "ingredients" we will be adding soon, which goes along with the 1/1000 and parts updates.

Finally, there is still an outstanding bug in remixing batches: if you modify a formulation in the calculator, the changes don't show up when you remix it. I've worked on that some and will try to get that fixed soon. I will probably spend a week here soon just bug fixing, as I'm sure more will probably be identified with the more recent updates.

David D.

0
0
0
123
about 1 month ago

Just so you know, I've forked Grazie! (my own project) and created a version that supports SurrealDB, named Allora. So far it's a 1 to 1 port, with just changes related to SurrealDB and dropping SQLite/PostgreSQL support. It's taken a lot longer to find time to work on it than I hoped. It will be the platform BeSquishy will be built on and will be open sourced eventually, along with the SurrealDB tools developed for it.

David D.

0
0
0
75

We've been doing some big calculator updates for ATF.

Formulation Mixes

We've added a formulation only mode to the calculator, so you can make premixes.

Premixes

You'll be able to add a Premix to the calculator, which can match the formulation or be additional ingredients. You'll also be able to replace a formulation with a premix.

Flavor Shots

You'll be able to mix with a flavor shot of a recipe.

Other

A big focus of the calculator changes initially were to make it more modular, but I'm not very happy with how that turned out. That will happen, but it'll be a work in progress and may wind up being a separate experimental mode.

We've fixed a few bugs with the calculator, most of which people haven't seemed to have noticed. I also fixed some bugs in the Recipe History display (again, probably unnoticed). There is one outstanding bug for remixing a batch, but I haven't tracked that one down just yet. I also fixed a bug that wasn't counting mixes correctly and one that didn't update if you added a flavor to flavor stash/favorite from a recipe.

I've also worked on improving the formulation selection for mixing, including a selector in the calculator. This won't be in the next update, but it's coming.

There's more, including some enhancements for tags in item lists and some public batch improvements, and some all new stuff that has been a work in progress.

David D.

0
0
0
103
2 months ago

Mid-summer in 2020, I started planning and buying parts for a new PC build. During all of that, I was also looking for a new Linux distro. At the time, I was tired of LTS and always having to manage a big chunk of my own package versions. I tried Fedora, but then an upgrade broke my desktop and I could have probably fixed it, but I decided I didn't want to deal with major distro upgrades at all. I tried Arch, then I tried Tumbleweed. I said, "Okay...I'm gonna give this [Tumbleweed] a try, I'll run it until it breaks." Well, 4 years later now, It never broke. Not only that, I went nearly 2 years without having to use snapper to roll back an update, at one point, and today, it has been 11 months and 15 days since my last roll back. That is insane reliability for a rolling distro. That's also without me having to manually fix anything, which you just don't do when you can just roll back.

Tumbleweed is the best Linux distro. It is.

David D.

0
0
0
132
3 months ago

She just squirtin' her coochie into the wind?

By my wife, watching a nature show, Night on Earth. The scene was of an Atlas Moth, for context, spreading pheromones.

David D.

0
0
0
105

This past week we released Recipe History, which allows you to track recipe revisions, revert to older versions of a recipe, or save an older version as a new recipe. We also released an update that allows you to copy a new recipe from a Batch of another recipe or update a recipe from a batch that was modified in the calculator before saving it. The third update added the flavor information from the Recipe editor to the calculator freeform and modify features. Finally, we added user cards that can be clicked to activate on Recipes and Formulations.

It's hard to believe we only have 12 weeks left this year. We still have a lot we want to do. This past week I developed the user cards and did some finishing touches on the Recipe History before launch. I also worked on the ability to mix a recipe as a flavor shot, which is mostly functional now, and the ability to select ingredients in a formulation to be part of a premix. These are all built on the branch that adds the ability to mix a formulation without a recipe, so the part that creates a premix.

We are getting close to the calculator state we want, which will allow us to add more functionality to it. We also want to break up the calculator and make it more modular, but that should preserve functionality and just allow us to do more things more easily in the future. I should be getting my co-worker back soon too, so either the pace will pick up or we'll be developing a wider range of features.

David D.

0
0
0
146

Today I begin using Zen, an open source browser, based on Firefox. As far as I can tell, it had its first alpha release in July 2024 and is still in alpha status. Be careful, there is another Zen Browser, based on Chrome, that is older and has a different web site (zen-browser.com). The correct website is zen-browser.app.

Being based on a mature browser like Firefox, the alpha status is somewhat deceiving. It seems to run very well for me. It has side tabs and some interesting features, like a sidebar browser and split browsing windows. It also supports everything that Firefox does, so if you want to use sync or whatever else, it seems to all be functional.

I'm currently using the flatpak, but for Linux it also has an AppImage and a portable binary. There are also downloads available for Windows and Mac, if you are into that type of thing.

I've been using the Developer edition of Firefox and I also have the development repo (openSUSE Tumbleweed) version installed, which is a build of the normal Firefox, slightly ahead of the normal package. The Developer edition is maintained by Mozilla, not openSUSE, and auto-updates, but today's update basically broke it for me. My toolbars and customizations are all shuffled around or just gone. I decided maybe it's time to try a different browser, so I searched for browsers based on Firefox and found Zen. I'm not saying I'm dropping Firefox, just that I'll try Zen for a while and see how it goes. I've used Firefox since 2002, when it was called Phoenix. I've tried a lot of browsers since then, but Firefox has been my browser for a long time. I'd probably build my own browser before I'd use Chrome or anything based on it.

David D.

0
0
0
178

This week I opened pull requests (reviews) for updates that add a revision system for Recipes. This displays every change to a recipe, including if it was created from a copy of another recipe or from a batch of another recipe, or updated from a batch from the same recipe.

I also opened a pull request that adds the flavor info to the calculator modify function and to the free form calculator.

After that I've worked on adding the ability to mix a recipe as a flavor shot, at a specific percentage, the ability to mix formulations as premixed bases, and the ability to designed premixes in the calculator. Those aren't complete and, due to the overall complexity of the calculator, are actually a little more difficult to implement than you may imagine.

There is another calculator update on tabs next, which will make it possible to select any formulation from the calculator itself, rather than having to find it on the recipe page. That should catch us up to what most people have requested and lines us up for a new type of ingredient and a new way to create formulations and use formulations. Eventually I want to add some new community features and better browsing features for batches and tags...but I'm slowly getting there.

David D.

0
0
0
182

I've been working on a Recipe versioning system for ATF. It's been...not that easy, but I ended up reverting back to the simplest way I could think of. I've probably built 10 different versions, ironically, of the version system. The system I ended up deciding was the best is mostly like openSUSE's Snapper. It creates a pre and post-change snapshot, with some pre variations, depending on the source of the revision. Currently, the only time a revision is triggered is when a flavor changes, but I am experimenting with other things, like recipe descriptions.

Additionally, I've also been working on the ability to update or create a recipe from a batch. This ties into the versioning system, but is change to the way we normally update recipes. The idea is, instead of simply editing a recipe, you create a new mix and change the flavors within the calculator. You then mix it and try it, if it's good, then you can update the recipe directly from the batch. This creates a new revision of the recipe and ties that revision to the batch and recipe. It's a change to the normal recipe development workflow, but it should make it simpler and reduce the number of clones and things like that.

Finally, I haven't forgotten about clones. If you clone a public recipe, that recipe will be tied to revision 0, which is the initial version. If it wasn't a public recipe, then it acts like the current cloning system and ignores the original version. This allows you to create original recipes, even if they are actually based on a private recipe base. Also, sometimes you may create a new batch that is good, but should be it's own recipe. The new version system will allow you to create a new recipe from that batch, like a clone, except it's from a batch. This means you can start out just creating batches, and when you get to the point where it's a legitimate recipe, then you save it as a recipe from the batch.

So the next features will be recipe versions and recipes (updates or new) from batches. After that we have some calculator updates and some new recipe features, plus some community features. I'm not sure which order those will come, but both are a priority. Among the calculator updates are some new features, mostly for our flavorists and vendors, but they could be exciting for others in our DIY community, who aren't necessarily happy just using regular flavors ;) More to come on those. That's it for the week 38 update. Sorry for the gap in weeks, I'll try to do better with the updates.

David D.

0
0
0
164
4 months ago

I've been considering moving away from Github for a while and have moved in the past. For, I think, 2 or 3 years I used BitBucket and I hosted a private git server as well. A couple of projects I contributed to brought me back to Github and then All the Flavors chose Github. I think I'm going to start using other services again, even if I do still use Github for some. I'm going give codeberg.org a try. I had considered it not too long ago and I think I had decided to wait until they have more services set up. I don't plan to move any of my current projects, which I had done with BitBucket previously, and I may move those to Codeberg.

I have 3 projects that aren't in remote repositories and they'll probably be private for a while. I'll announce those at a later time. Anyway, just giving a heads up if anyone follows my Github. I'll be putting a link in the footer to my Codeberg at some point.

David D.

0
0
0
173

I've been spending my spare time working on Node.js tools for SurrealDB. The 2 that are showing some promise are named Surrealigrate (a migration tool) and Bole ORM. I may end up changing their names, but for now that's what I'm calling them.

I've talked about both of them, so I'll try not to repeat myself. I've worked on expanding Surrealigrate some, but I need to work on some more advanced schemas and namespace setups to really push it. This week I've mostly focused on Bole ORM. The word "bole" is a kind of clay or the trunk of a tree, which both are kinda fitting for an ORM, in my opinion. My approach with all of my SurrealDB tools has been to take advantage of the built-in info queries and generate database specific code. A lot of tools, especially ORMs, are very standardized and strict with their implementation. I don't want that. I want to be able to generate query tools that are specific to the database and then be able to adapt them however I want, without the ORM getting in my way.

Bole ORM is a simple CLI tool and it generates a query class built for that specific database, down to table names and specific fields' validation. It doesn't require any kind of schema files or anything that manually needs to be done by the developer, it's all generated by inspecting the database. While it currently generates a class, to be used as object-oriented, I also plan to make it configurable, so if you prefer chaining, it'll do chaining, instead of objects. It resembles Prisma in the way the queries look, when using the class output, but it's simplier and I'm pretty sure the where and fields (Prisma's select object) objects may support more options than most Prisma methods support.

All the Flavors uses Prisma, so I'm very familiar with it and it's actually powerful when combined with a GraphQL parser. That is why I'm mimicking Prisma, to some extent, but also adapting with some things I feel Prisma could have done better. Once the feature set is, well, set, then I'll go into more details for the actual capabilities...but there's also a catch. I plan to make the generator modular, so you can plugin whatever you want, leave out whatever you don't, or add custom modules. This means you can basically design your own ORM with modules and just let Bole generate it.

I want to add some additional utilities to each. For Surrealigrate, I want it to be able to identify potential missing indexes and suggest changes. I also want it to be able to use either schema within SurrealDB or from a library, such as Zod, to generate migrations. The other side of that, I want Surrealigrate to be able to generate a Zod schema and validations for use outside of Surrealigrate, in Bole ORM or just in your application in general. As far as Bole ORM additions, I want to generate documentation for the specific database, and Bole ORM itself, and I want to do automated tests, primarily on data integrity, but also for the application itself.

The idea behind these tools is to simplify development and have something you use when you need them, but they get out of your way when you don't. There's no point in making someone run a bunch of CLI commands, when you can use Surrealist to design your database, then just run a simple command that does everything else. That's the way I see it anyway. If extra commands are involved, they are optional and they add value, like a command to generate a Bole query that you can paste into your application. That could just be a plugin though, and then it just updates a generated export and you never have to touch it again. Working for you, not against you.

David D.

0
1
0
246

Every week I'm going to do a summary of what I've been working on for All the Flavors (ATF) and some of the things we are planning. I'll write it throughout the week and try to publish it by the following Monday. This is the first time, so I'll start with

Week 31:

  • We released ATF v.2.3.13. It featured administrative tools for creating and managing badges for Users, Recipes, and Vendors. It also fix a bug in the messages application that prevented replies to reports sometimes. Finally, it introduced improved email queuing and sending, without which could make the API seem sluggish at times.

  • I also submitted the Pull Request for Remixing Batches for Recipe + Formulation batches.

Week 32:

  • Monday I submitted Pull Requests for improving the button layout in the Recipe editor and permissions system improvements. Finer-grained permissions will allow us to delegate some tasks to specific users, such as a Vendor being able to assign their badge to users or a streamer having a badge for their followers.

    • I also worked on a new feature earlier in the day, which I wasn't able to complete. It involves a new calculator mode, but I'm not sure when I'll be able to finish it, so I wont say what it is just yet.

  • Tuesday I worked on ways to make the mix calculator more modular and the new mix mode. The calculator is very complex, so I want to refactor it to be more data driven, but found it was too much work for this time allotment. Then I planned out some ways to utilize public batches.

  • Wednesday I submitted a Pull Request that adds a Batches list to Mixers' profiles to display public batches. I also restyled the way batches display to make some slight improvements and added a Mix button to both the My Stuff batches and profile batches, which allows you to mix that batch [again].

  • Thursday & Friday I worked on a data expansion project we are integrating into ATF

David D.

0
0
0
243

Batches on All the Flavors are the result of mixing a recipe. They are an optional last step (Create Batch button), but they are useful snapshots of a recipe's history, and they provide the utility of updating Stash amounts. One of my goals is to make the batches more important and have more utility. The first step in that was to allow batches to be public, which has partially been done, but there isn't a public directory of batches, you have to have a link to find it. Now I am working on allowing you to remix a batch. I'm still working out the exact details, but the goal is to allow you to just go to a batch, click Remix, and do it over again. It's currently functional, but it's not using all of the batch data explicitly, as I'm still working out option for formulations.

This is a pretty big change in the normal workflow and isn't even the end goal. I wont share all of the plans, just yet, but this new feature, combined with public batches, means you can easily share different iterations of a recipe and other users can actually mix them. It also allows you to move recipe development out of the main recipe, because you can edit in the calculator and keep remixing, editing, etc before updating a recipe or needing to make copies of a recipe. It keeps the workflow for a recipe contained to that recipe, without requiring changes that you don't know if you want to keep or not. It also means if you've mixed a recipe and it was later changed, you can still mix the original recipe without cloning it, just remix the batch you mixed before.

David D.

0
1
0
246

ATF v1 had the concept of Badges, which are like awards that users received for doing something, like having a recipe that had 500 views or submitted bug reports, I even have a developer badge on my profile. Badges were just ways to reward users for contributions and a thanks for being a part of the community. Now, badges are coming back in ATF v2.

Yesterday, I submitted a pull request for All the Flavors to reintroduce Badges. They've been present on user profiles for ATF v1 users, but we haven't issued them since moving to ATF v2. Once the pull request is reviewed and approved, we'll be able to introduce new badges for Users, Recipes, and Vendors. ATF v1 only support them for Users.

We have a lot of exciting new things coming with badges, they are just another step and help restore one more feature we didn't fully implement in v2. There aren't many of those v1 features left, so the new stuff coming is pushing us more toward v3 than adding v1 parity.

I hadn't been talking a lot about All the Flavors here, so I think I'll start. This new stuff is maybe going to change our part of the DIY world.

David D.

0
1
0
271

Fixed some bugs:

  • Pages now display titles as set in site settings

  • Improved SEO support

  • Posts category pages no longer show 404 when not logged in

  • Home page now shows even number of posts and columns

  • Error pages have better theme/color scheme support

My next focus will be on finishing Notes and then I'll probably be expanding Pages to support Categories and some more advanced options.

David D.

0
0
0
157
5 months ago

I've finally built up my SurrealDB tool set enough, I think, I can finally pick a launch date for BeSquishy. BeSquishy is a social network I've been building for a very long time. I had planned to launch it earlier this year, but had some delays and then I decided I no longer wanted to support ArangoDB. The problem is I want to build a SaaS behind BeSquishy, but ArangoDB no longer allows this with their open source package and they wont give me a quote for the enterprise package...so I had to swap databases. Seriously, they wouldn't reply to my email quote requests and when I tried their chat, they just said they'd email me, "the starting prices". They never did and I don't want to work with them anymore anyway.

Today I started building out the schema and using my SurrealDB tools in the software behind BeSquishy. With the progress I've made, I'm pretty sure I can launch sometime in October. I don't think I'll be releasing the code behind BeSquishy as open source anytime soon, but I will be releasing the tools I use to build it. I'll also be releasing an SDK, that allows you to build a web site inside BeSquishy, which you can use to power an external web site's data layer. I'll also have other services tied in, which will provide useful features you don't often have on a typical web site infrastructure.

I'll keep you updated a few times between now and then, but hopefully I can launch it in October...

David D.

0
0
0
209

I play Splitgate, which is an arena FPS with a really cool portal mechanic. Well they've been working on a new game for almost 2 years, I think, it's been a while. They stopped development on Splitgate to make the new game. Their website currently has a countdown timer and a July 18th date... Splitgaters are getting excited, but we don't know exactly what the countdown is to. Some think it's just a new teaser video. Others think it's a release. The intensity is building.

What is interesting, and potentially an indicator, is they refreshed their Discord server, so most of the old channels are gone, it has a new logo, and there are 3 new Server Status channels for Steam, Xbox, and PlayStation that are currently locked. The current Splitgate game is still online, so it's odd they would take down everything for the current game, unless the new one is actually coming soon.

Timer is down to 4 hours and 36 minutes, so I'll guess we'll know in the morning...

David D.

0
1
0
272

In case you haven't noticed, I've been building a lot of SurrealDB tools lately. I'm a big proponent of having a deep toolbox that works for you. The old PHP frameworks had basically everything you needed and you could build pretty much anything with them. Node.js is slowly getting there will the SSR frameworks, but if you are using something new, like SurrealDB, there aren't a lot of options.

Everything I've been building isn't just for SurrealDB. I've also been building more generic Node.js tools too. My approach is to build some libraries that aren't NPM packages and don't have a lot of NPM dependencies. The idea is you can choose the libraries you want to use, put them in your project as a submodule, and either follow the projects' progress or just freeze it and use as is, or even make it into something more tailored to your project's needs. Here are some of the more generic ones, before I get into the ones I'm really excited about.

Node.js Process Manager

A simple library that can be used to manage your Node.js processes, like starting, stopping, restarting, or auto-starting a script. There's not a lot to it and it has very few NPM dependencies. If it expands much, it will likely be to add dependency management, so if your script requires another process, it will ensure that one is running too.

Quality Control Manager

This is a different approach than what I normally do and has the opportunity to really make managing a project easier. This is a bit broader than the process manager and wears several hats, but I think it's a needed tool. At its base, it's a documentation generator, but it's also much more. It uses AST to outline all of your code, then uses that to generate documentation, a code trace tree for each function, and usage examples. It has a built in server or it can output the files for use elsewhere. I also want to add tests generation, error checking, and quality analysis.

Others

I have some others, but I don't want to discuss those yet, as I don't have a clear vision for their potential implementations. Let's just say, I'm working on automating pretty much everything.

SurrealDB Tools

So this what I'm getting excited about.

Database Migrations

I've built a migration tool for SurrealDB. Not a big deal, right? Well it's pretty cool. It does the normal migration handling stuff, so you have a development server and a production server, and it allows you to sync your database schema, by using migration files. It also allows you to roll back migrations, either back to a specific migration, back to the beginning, or forward to a specific migration. The cool thing is you can allow it to inspect your database, you can then make whatever changes you want, then allow it to re-inspect your database and generate your new migrations for you. It compares the inspected database to the new, modified database, and builds the script to go from old to new on another server.

Database ORM

I've built a tool that can generate an ORM, based on your database schema. It's built on top of surrealdb.js, so it doesn't limit anything you can currently do, but then it provides some really cool shortcut features to make complex queries as easy as possible. It currently looks a lot like how you use Prisma, but without a lot of the corners Prisma tends to push you into. This thing really adds a lot of features and I plan to retool the generator to let you customize how the ORM works. So if you prefer chained queries, then it'll do chaining, if you prefer object queries, it'll do objects. It also uses your current database to generate the ORM, there's no schema file to deal with, like Prisma has.

SurrealDB Crucible

Finally, this isn't so much a tool, as a way to push the limits of the tools. This is where I put the tools together and make sure they all work together. It's already been useful to find limitations and prove the loose projects approach is capable. It's basically a proving ground, but I'll likely use it as a way to document all of the tools and demonstrate how they work together. It could also become a starter template, or at least the basis for one, in the future.

So that is some of the stuff I've been working on in my spare time. It's been a lot of work, but I feel like each tool is building onto the previous tool, so eventually it'll add up to saving time, I believe. The migrations and ORM alone have a lot of time saving opportunities, for myself anyway. I plan to add branching and more complex version control to the migrations. I also want to add the ability to export specific tables to create a new migration tree, so then it becomes a tool than can be used to spawn new projects. Learn from the best, then make things better :)

David D.

0
0
0
227

I've been building a new ORM for SurrealDB, which is designed to work with my SurrealDB migration tool. It is a generative ORM, so it will be tailored to the database and you'll be able to generate the ORM methods in either Typescript or ESM Javascript. It will have built in types validation and a ton of query options. It will also, eventually, have custom specs, so you can override the build instructions to result in the structure you desire. This means if you prefer one ORM style over another, then you'll be able to use that style, but have the same features. Whether you want chained methods or a simple object parameter, it'll all be configurable. You'll also be able to create or utilize multiple styles, using a namespace, or import additional table classes from within packages, because all of the methods will be compatible. Pretty cool I think :)

David D.

0
0
0
361

Update: I disabled the color scheme change transition, due to a bug. It was kind of a novelty anyway, I'll try to fix it and bring it back later.


I decided to go ahead and update to the latest development version of Grazie! CMS. There are lots of theme fixes/updates and little enhancements here and there. I decided to go with a darker dark color scheme and I've tried to make title colors/sizes more consistent across the site. There is also a new color scheme toggle on the bottom right corner of the page and I'll have some social links there (once I update the settings). The light color scheme also has a lot of fixes and clean up, but it's quite where I want it. You can check out my previous Grazie blog to see the whole list and some of the things I'm working on.

David D.

0
1
0
239
5 months ago

I spent some time this afternoon working on Grazie! (the CMS that runs this site). I haven't updated here in a quite a while, so I'll have to check some older changes, but here are some from today:

  • Various bug fixes

    • Fixed an issue that hadn't come up, previously unused, regarding fetching and caching settings stored as objects

    • Fixed an issue where some settings didn't fall back to their grazie.config settings

    • Fixed some keys that were based on old data properties (which meant they weren't unique)

    • Fixed some Typescript types

  • grazie.config.default.js is now the default config

    • override it with a grazie.config.js file

  • Added a SocialIcons component, so the icons in the footer can be functional

    • Added support for footer.social setting for twitter, github, instagram, etc

  • Favorite theme now uses SocialIcons in Footer component

  • Added an SEO component to generate meta() function arrays

  • The SQLite data.db file now defaults to the /data folder (previously in the /prisma folder)

  • Favorite theme is moving to a cyan color scheme

  • Working toward migrating all titles to be more easily themed universally

  • Updated all packages to latest versions

Today I bumped the version up to 0.5.0. It may get bumped again before I update here. I have a few more things to add, but I'm liking the cyan color scheme, so I may go ahead and update here if I don't have time to get to all of it. Here are a few things on my TODO list:

  • Finish Notes app

  • Finish Categories page

  • Finish refactoring titles to be more easily themed

  • Refactor all colors to use --mantine- variables

  • Fix light mode color scheme (mostly depends on the above)

  • Make dark mode darker

  • Add a theme editor to make most of them customizable

  • Add ability to have a dropdown in the navlinks (uses settings to be dynamic)

  • Add a settings preset, to allow reverting settings to default or knowing which settings to add (read are supported)

  • Add ability to upload and set site logo and favicon

Those are a few of what's on my list. There are quite a few others, but I need to build up to those and I feel the above are more important at the moment. I need to utilize the built-in features in Mantine better. I also want to add some help features, for both user and admin, and more image/upload features. I plan to build a Grazie! website soon, so some new features will come with that. Part of that will probably be updating to use the latest Remix recommended Vite features and adding a fastify server for serving an API or whatever you want.

More to come. You'll definitely know when I update again, the new theme updates make the current one here look pretty bland.

David D.

0
1
0
260
6 months ago

I've been trying to get a quote for a self-managed ArangoDB Enterprise license. I don't understand how there isn't a price. Like, you buy something, and then you use it. I've sent 2 emails through their contact form, almost 2 weeks apart. I've attempted 2 times to get a quote through their chat. There's apparently no price? It's almost like they are charging whatever they think they can get out of a client. The "person" I talked to in the chat said they'd email me the "starting price". Such a great database, this is breaking my heart.

David D.

0
2
0
268
6 months ago

Interesting discussion to watch at openSUSE Conference 2024.

Brief: SUSE has presented openSUSE with an opportunity to rebrand away from a direct connection to SUSE. This is in an attempt to preserve SUSE's branding and protect it from ambiguity. The discussion is presented by a representative from SUSE and a representative from openSUSE.

I personally think openSUSE should take the opportunity and run with it.

David D.

0
0
0
2672
6 months ago

I've started work on a Process Manager for Node.js projects that can be used to start, stop, and autostart Node.js scripts. The idea is to create something small that has a simple purpose and doesn't require a lot of dependencies. I'm still looking for a name. Like several of my other utility projects I've currently working on, this one is intended to be included in projects and not installed as a package. I also plan to include a library that can be used for UI control of Node.js applications.

David D.

0
0
0
229

David Dyess .com

Copyright © 1999 - 2024